Meta on AO3: Get it while you can.
Jul. 11th, 2012 08:28 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I just got an email from AO3 - because my meta was reported by an unhappy Sherlock fan, the AO3 team had to review it, and they seem to have decided that they want to be a fanfiction-only site and that I have to remove it.
So, to anyone who hasn't downloaded my Study in Pink rewatch yet, and wants to. You have ~16 hours before I delete it. It is now deleted.
At this point, I don't really care anymore. And the AO3 team are perfectly within their rights to run their site however they want. It's not like I'm paying them to host things for me.
I still don't think I'll join mediafire or anything like that. I just don't feel like it. Maybe I'm being persnickety, but for some reason I just don't like file-sharing sites. Anyway, I suppose if enough of you gang-up on me, I might eventually break down and upload pdfs somewhere. But, right now that feels unlikely.
AO3 kind of sucks for meta anyway, because so few people comment over there so there's no discussion afterward (which is one of my favourite parts of writing meta, since, you know, I already know my own thoughts, but I don't know other people's).
Unrelated:
TNP People - I have been crazy busy and I'm flying in an airplane all day today, so the chapter is going to be delayed by at least another week. In the meantime, tell me what you think I should change in the next draft to make the story/pacing/plot/characters suck less!
UPDATE: Five minutes after I deleted the meta, I got an email from AO3 apologizing for telling me to delete the meta and saying that I could keep it up until they make a final decision on the status of meta as a fanwork and whether it should be allowed on the site. They also asked to please let them know if I had any thoughts to contribute to the discussion. Even though it's 3am here (and midnight Vancouver time) I wrote them back and gave them a few thoughts. The work has already been deleted, so I can't undo that - but it's nice to know that there's still a chance that I could one day post it again.
At this point, I don't really care anymore. And the AO3 team are perfectly within their rights to run their site however they want. It's not like I'm paying them to host things for me.
I still don't think I'll join mediafire or anything like that. I just don't feel like it. Maybe I'm being persnickety, but for some reason I just don't like file-sharing sites. Anyway, I suppose if enough of you gang-up on me, I might eventually break down and upload pdfs somewhere. But, right now that feels unlikely.
AO3 kind of sucks for meta anyway, because so few people comment over there so there's no discussion afterward (which is one of my favourite parts of writing meta, since, you know, I already know my own thoughts, but I don't know other people's).
Unrelated:
TNP People - I have been crazy busy and I'm flying in an airplane all day today, so the chapter is going to be delayed by at least another week. In the meantime, tell me what you think I should change in the next draft to make the story/pacing/plot/characters suck less!
UPDATE: Five minutes after I deleted the meta, I got an email from AO3 apologizing for telling me to delete the meta and saying that I could keep it up until they make a final decision on the status of meta as a fanwork and whether it should be allowed on the site. They also asked to please let them know if I had any thoughts to contribute to the discussion. Even though it's 3am here (and midnight Vancouver time) I wrote them back and gave them a few thoughts. The work has already been deleted, so I can't undo that - but it's nice to know that there's still a chance that I could one day post it again.
no subject
Date: 2012-07-11 03:41 pm (UTC)If your problem is supporting MF, I have an account you could host it on. And I also can make PDFs. Just offering it up, if you're comfortable with it.
no subject
Date: 2012-07-11 03:47 pm (UTC)That'd certainly be preferable to getting my own account. Thanks for the offer! Let me roll it around in my head for the day and I'll get back to you. :)
And yeah, part of me is disappointed because the way AO3 is set up would make it MUCH easier for me to post my SPN Timeline over there.
I guess we have to wait for some entrepreneurial fan to create an AO3-like site for meta. I hope someone does. Sadly, it is not going to be me.
no subject
Date: 2012-07-11 03:55 pm (UTC)Yeah, I'd love to see a site like that. I would read the ever-loving shit out of everything there, even the stuff for things I didn't watch/read lol. I'm starting to wonder, though, where they're going to draw the line, now that they've started? Fanfic and fanfic only? What about meta in fanfic form? What about mixed-media posts? What about fanart? I guess that's the problem whenever someone starts deciding what you can't do.
no subject
Date: 2012-07-11 04:16 pm (UTC)I do it too though...I hate it when people call their reaction/review posts "meta" (which is why I don't label my "Quick Reaction" posts as meta). That's not an indepth study of the episode/character/theme, that's just an emotional response and ungathered thoughts.
I was even loathe to call my rewatches meta. You may notice that none of my SPN rewatches are tagged "meta", because I still don't think I'm talking about the show indepthly enough to deserve that label.
With my Study in Pink rewatch sitting at over 14,000 words though, I decided that it was less of a "reaction" and more of a "meta on character motivations and personalities as revealed in A Study in Pink plus general thoughts on the adaptation" (I just went with a shorter title :P)
So yeah, if I ran a meta site, I'd be constantly seeing people post things there that I didn't believe were "proper meta"...but then whether I asked them to take it down or not is another question, I suppose. I mean, I can't really get mad at people for defining "meta" differently than I do, just like I can't get made at AO3 if they don't see meta as being a "fanwork". FYI: This is the part of the TOS they quoted me:
Our Terms of Service, Section IV, part H, state in part:
H. Illegal and inappropriate content:
The Archive of Our Own is a place for fanworks… Content may not be uploaded to OTW’s servers if it …consists entirely of actual instruction manuals, technical data, recipes, or other non-fanwork content, including non-fanwork creative work. Uploading such content is a violation of the ToS.
(Emphasis is theirs)
no subject
Date: 2012-07-11 04:34 pm (UTC)I hate that fanwork and non-fanwork are such broad categories. They get to decide what's a fanwork and which kinds of fanworks they'll allow...and for a group that touts openness and an interest in fans and their creations, it's just really disappointing to me. I'm very invested in things like OTW and Dreamwidth, things that open doors, so it's a big deal for me when I see either limiting their services and what can be posted.
no subject
Date: 2012-07-11 04:40 pm (UTC)Also, good idea with the different types of meta! Haha, I had never thought of that. *now I feel kind of ridiculously stupid*
no subject
Date: 2012-07-11 04:37 pm (UTC)Evidence suggests that this is a CANONICAL FUCKING TAG. With fourteen hundred works.
no subject
Date: 2012-07-11 04:41 pm (UTC)But whatever. *shrug* It's not worth arguing about, at least, not for me anyway.
no subject
Date: 2012-07-11 04:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-07-12 08:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-07-12 12:53 pm (UTC)ETA: Wow, what's it like to have started such a discourse about this stuff?
no subject
Date: 2012-07-12 04:04 pm (UTC)I mean, when I first got the angry comments from AO3 users, I was pissed off an up-in-arms about it. (But I think that was mainly the fault of the commenters tone - and also the fact that they really had no right to tell me how to use the site, since there was no mention that meta wasn't allowed in the TOS).
But, after writing to AO3 and receiving emails about it from them, I wasn't really angry anymore...I'm perfectly respectful of whatever decision they come to. It's their site and their decision, and I CAN see the argument for not allowing meta just as much as I can see the argument for allowing it.
So, it feels sort of funny to have started the discourse even though I'm not rage-shouting about it. Usually this sort of discourse is started by people who are much angrier than I am. :P
Anyway, I will keep you updated! :)
no subject
Date: 2012-07-12 05:31 am (UTC)/drive-by led here from unofficialotwnews
ETA: I misspoke, but: - http://fanlore.org/wiki/Original_Yaoi &
http://fail-fandomanon.livejournal.com/37106.html?thread=165796594#t165796594
might shed some light. :)
no subject
Date: 2012-07-12 05:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-07-12 05:51 am (UTC)http://fail-fandomanon.livejournal.com/37106.html?thread=165792498#t165792498
no subject
Date: 2012-07-11 04:37 pm (UTC)The fuck?
no subject
Date: 2012-07-11 04:43 pm (UTC)Maybe when I have time later, I'll see if there's a setting somewhere that I can change. It's not like I get much spam here that I have to worry about.
no subject
Date: 2012-07-12 05:34 pm (UTC)You can change that setting here - just uncheck the "Spam Protection" box. (The special section they're talking about is here in your Inbox.)
no subject
Date: 2012-07-12 05:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-07-12 06:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-07-11 05:01 pm (UTC)Meta for me is a vital part of fanfic. Meta is engaging, creative work.
I don't respect their decision. D:
no subject
Date: 2012-07-11 05:07 pm (UTC)But, it makes me happy to know that there are people like you out there that love and support meta. :)
no subject
Date: 2012-07-12 01:35 am (UTC)A friend of mine also got pinged to take down her meta today, which really kinda bugged me, given that Fanlore's definition of fanwork actually includes meta as one of the categories. It's like... fanfiction's cool, fanart is cool, fanvids are cool, but fan-nonfiction is apparently a no-go, and that's not clear anywhere in the TOS.
Meta in the context of fandom is something that wouldn't exist without fannishness and fannish culture, so I honestly have no idea why it's not considered a 'fanwork'. Honestly, I just want to throw my hands up in the air and go whaaaaat sometimes.
no subject
Date: 2012-07-12 05:37 am (UTC)I agree that they should put it clearly in their TOS. When I wrote and asked, they said that it was still under discussion, but I was fine as long as no one reported me - of course, I already knew someone had reported me, so it was only a matter of time. :P
no subject
Date: 2012-07-14 09:58 am (UTC)In the very beginnings of AO3 I even got reported because I answered to comments left for my fic with a short thank you note and was told this wasn't allowed. So I deleted my answers to the comments - which must have looked very rude to the commenters - only to find some while later that meanwhile it was totally common and everyone answered to their comments. *shrug*
The archive is still developing and nothing is written in stone.
no subject
Date: 2012-07-14 04:36 pm (UTC)I'm fine with keeping my "discussion" type meta on LJ, really. There's a "resource" type "meta" that I would love to post on AO3 though, because I think AO3 is much better set up to handle it...and it's also a resource that other people can use for fic, so it'd be nice to have it archived somewhere.
But yeah, it's a tricky thing to try to decide where to draw lines in the sand when you run a website. I certainly don't envy AO3 the task.