The Hunger Games
Jun. 24th, 2012 12:03 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
My sister is in town for the weekend, and her son wanted to see The Hunger Games. Luckily, Vancouver happens to have a theatre that is STILL PLAYING IT.
I went along...
I have not read the books...
But I keep hearing all this stuff about Katniss/Peeta or Katniss/Gale (or Peniss and Kale?)...but but...did people see the same movie that I did? Because where the hell are my Katniss/Cinna shippers?!? This is my OTP....at least for the movie.
Anyway, good times. Really well done movie. Katniss was a really great character. I also liked how the wounds/injuries were realistic...in that when they got injured, it was srs bsns...and Katniss actually went into shell shock when something exploded close to her.
But, like I said, I haven't read the books, so I have no idea whether it's a faithful adaptation or not. I just thought it was a good film.
I went along...
I have not read the books...
But I keep hearing all this stuff about Katniss/Peeta or Katniss/Gale (or Peniss and Kale?)...but but...did people see the same movie that I did? Because where the hell are my Katniss/Cinna shippers?!? This is my OTP....at least for the movie.
Anyway, good times. Really well done movie. Katniss was a really great character. I also liked how the wounds/injuries were realistic...in that when they got injured, it was srs bsns...and Katniss actually went into shell shock when something exploded close to her.
But, like I said, I haven't read the books, so I have no idea whether it's a faithful adaptation or not. I just thought it was a good film.
no subject
Date: 2012-06-24 07:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-24 07:26 am (UTC)I'm not a huge fan of Lenny Kravitz's music - but I thought he was wonderful in this film (and quite good looking, I was digging the gold eye-liner). I thought everyone did a great great job. Also, Stanley Tucci is amazing, even in a relatively small role.
no subject
Date: 2012-06-24 09:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-24 05:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-24 07:37 pm (UTC)Not sure what it is about the movie that gets me to reject it like this...I have got no clue! It really isn't quite rational but I feel the very strong urge to never, ever see it.
Quite odd...really. Inception was another movie like this. There was so much chatter on LJ and so much squeeing and it put me off. I still haven't managed to see it...
no subject
Date: 2012-06-24 07:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-24 07:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-24 02:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-24 05:31 pm (UTC)My friend read them and liked them...I think except for maybe bits of the last one? I think her conclusion was that the first book was the strongest.
no subject
Date: 2012-06-24 06:41 pm (UTC)But I can occasionally be obsessive and overdramatic about things I love. :P
no subject
Date: 2012-06-24 06:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-24 06:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-24 05:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-24 05:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-24 07:20 pm (UTC)Another part of it is that I was willing to accept, for the purposes of the story, that things are as they are, but some of the explanations didn't do much expect to draw attention to the ways in which the world doesn't really make sense...which I'd been happily ignoring or handwaving up until that point, you know? For example, it's repeatedly mentioned that the whole system is designed to keep the districts in line and to crush their spirits. But it's kind of an Evil Overlord (who hasn't read the list) kind of plan, because from a real-world perspective, every little aspect of the system seems designed to foment rebellion, not to quell it. The real world has presented many, many ways in which to completely and very successfully oppress a population without tipping them over into outright rebellion. North Korea is practically a study in how far you can push it without going over the edge. However, keep a large number of people starving, or in danger of starvation...while constantly rubbing their faces in their oppression, without even a good propaganda arm, while also broadcasting people's suffering and nobility in the face of their oppressors...does not seem to be a very good way to do it. Which is not to say all fantasy premises need to be plausible; it's just that if you stop to explain these things as, "well, they make us do this because they want to humiliate us" and "we're kept on the edge of starvation because they're punishing us and want us to be oppressed" it can force the reader to consider these things. And it just doesn't add up.
Here's an example of the early prose:
"Gale knows his anger at Madge is misdirected, on other days, deep in the woods, I've listened to him rant about how the tesserae are just another tool to cause misery in our district. A way to plant hatred between the starving workers of the Seam and those who can generally count on super and thereby ensure we will never trust one another. "It's to the Capitol's advantage to have us divided among ourselves," he might say if there were no ears to hear but mine. If it wasn't a reaping day. If a girl with a gold pin and no tesserae had not made what I'm sure she thought was a harmless comment."
There's nothing wrong with it, it's just...clunky. Especially in context.
no subject
Date: 2012-06-24 07:30 pm (UTC)And yes, I was sort of having similar thoughts in the movie, like "um, if this is supposed to be preventing a rebellion...they're getting it backwards." :P
Though, it did remind me of some theories on what caused WWII...extremely vaguely.
no subject
Date: 2012-06-24 09:19 pm (UTC)So then I felt the onus was on me to actually go see the movie.... and I thought it was amazing. I really did not expect it to be quite as politically satirical as it was. I totally burst into tears in the middle at the events in District 11.
I kind of think most people who go to see it don't view it beyond the surface to see what the message is about the growing gap between rich and poor, and the exploitation of labor all over the world by the richer nations. I liked how they handled it.
also I totally ship Katniss/Cinna. Peeta is kind of weird if you ask me, and Gale is just not my type (nor Katniss's either I doubt).
Also, I am Appalachian, so it's awesome to see My People valorized in film. :P
no subject
Date: 2012-06-24 10:26 pm (UTC)Peeta is a very interesting character to me (again, I don't know what he's like in the books). In the movie, I thought he came across as a very cunning guy...but more bordering on the Slytherin form of cunning, rather than the Ravenclaw form.
Yay for Appalachia!!
no subject
Date: 2012-06-24 10:57 pm (UTC)In the books he goes through a lot, to say the least -- based on what my kid has reported to me!
Satire goes right over people's heads most of the time. Most people are not taught how to read it. ):
no subject
Date: 2012-06-25 01:57 am (UTC)It was a good movie, and, actually, a good adaptation, I thought. It stayed true through almost all the main points and only really deviated where it was necessary. I liked it.
I was really fascinated by the world and the social commentary, too. That's actually what attracted me to it. We get more of that in the later books, though, so it isn't as obvious in the movie.
no subject
Date: 2012-06-25 02:12 am (UTC)It's a pretty cool world. I actually really like dystopias, which is weird because I usually try to stay away from tragedies and depressing things...but dystopic worlds fascinate me, probably solely because of the social commentary on our own society.
I may read the books one day. They'd probably be pretty easy for me to find on audiobook - which, depending on my job, is usually the format that I can consume the fastest.
no subject
Date: 2012-06-25 02:16 am (UTC)Yeah, they're out on audiobook. I tried that, but I can never focus on what I'm listening to because I get the urge to multitask.
no subject
Date: 2012-06-25 02:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-25 02:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-25 02:27 am (UTC)